We don’t talk enough about men and work-life balance, not the way women have been talking about it for decades, with the same honesty and the same stakes. We have a whole vocabulary for what overwork costs women, what it costs families, what it costs the woman quietly managing everything at the margins. But the conversation about what total absorption into work costs men is much quieter. The friendships that dissolve, the children who learn not to interrupt, the self whittled down to professional function. That conversation tends to happen in softer rooms, if it happens at all.

A few weeks ago I was at a conference at Duke built around meaning, loneliness, and what it looks like to live well in a time when both feel harder to hold. Arthur Brooks was there and Iain McGilchrist was there, and it was the kind of conversation that follows you home on the plane and sits with you at the kitchen table for days.

Brooks has written about how men in America are unlikely to form new friendships after thirty, how work becomes not just what they do but who they are, the last remaining structure of identity. He has a phrase for the shallow relationships that fill the space, “deal friends,” built on transaction and utility rather than genuine sustenance. His worry is that we have normalized a version of male life in which depth gets steadily traded for productivity, and no one calls it loneliness because it doesn’t look like loneliness from the outside.

McGilchrist arrived somewhere nearby from a different direction. He talks about two kinds of attention, one narrow and grasping, oriented toward getting and using, the other open and patient, oriented toward connection and what actually matters. His worry is that we have built a world rewarding the first almost exclusively while quietly starving the second, and that meaning doesn’t come from optimizing your life but from staying genuinely present to it.

I flew home thinking about Shabbir.

He has returned to work, gradually, the way you ease back into cold water. A meeting here, a conversation there, the slow reopening of a professional self that had been suspended, not erased. Researchers who study cancer survivors say this is one of the most psychologically significant moments in recovery, not the end of treatment but the return to a role that tells you who you are outside of illness. You are more than a patient. Work, at its best, gives that back. And I can see it in him, the way his energy sharpens after a good call, the way a difficult problem seems almost nourishing.

But what the research also shows, and what feels true from lived experience, is that the person who returns to work after something like this is not the same person who left. Illness strips life down to its essentials. It clarifies, sometimes brutally, what was actually central and what only pretended to be. And the question that follows a survivor back into the office, whether they name it or not, is whether they can carry that clarity with them or whether the old grooves will quietly reopen.

For men especially, those grooves run deep. The culture has long treated professional absorption as a kind of nobility. He is focused, driven, carrying a lot. The hours disappear around him and this gets narrated as seriousness rather than partial absence. The home adapts, the children learn the shape of maybe later, and the woman across from him becomes, slowly, more infrastructure than companion. I watched versions of this in other families. I watched it, in different ways, in ours.

What illness did was interrupt that story without asking.

I’ve written about some of what shifted this past year. How I watched Shabbir become present in ways I had wanted for years and given up asking for. The year was enormous. And what gets clarified that way, you can’t unsee.

The question I find myself sitting with now is not whether Shabbir can do it, he can, but whether the reentry becomes a genuine new chapter or just a gradual slide back into old patterns dressed in new gratitude. I watch this with hope and wariness held together, and I think that’s the honest place to be.

Families are porous, and work doesn’t stay in its lane. It shapes the emotional weather of a house. This is why I’ve never been able to take the language of balance lightly, even when it gets used so casually it sounds like lifestyle branding. Balance is not a cute aspiration. It’s an ethical question about what kind of presence we owe each other.

I keep coming back to what McGilchrist was describing at that conference, that we can pay such narrow, consuming attention to one part of our lives that we lose access to the wider world that gives it meaning, that we mistake the getting and the doing for the thing itself. Women know something about the opposite of that, even without the language for it. We know what it is to think in fragments, to carry six lines of attention at once, to long for an hour not already claimed by someone else’s need and to watch a meaningful life quietly reduce itself to maintenance if we’re not careful.

After a year like ours, none of this feels abstract. It feels domestic. Marital. Spiritual, even.

I don’t have neat answers for what comes next. I only know that this season has made me suspicious of any version of success that requires us to become less available to wonder and to each other. Some evenings I watch Shabbir moving between things that once seemed impossible to hold together, work and recovery and fatherhood and the quiet pleasure of an ordinary day, and there is so much gratitude in that image alongside something in me that stays quietly attentive. Not fearfully. Just honestly.

Survivorship, I’ve come to understand, is not about returning to the person you were before. It’s about figuring out who you are now, and choosing carefully what gets to occupy the center.

Subscribe now

We were halfway through dinner when someone asked me to look back.

It was the day after my birthday, and the table was full of people who have known me across many versions of my life. At some point between the appetizers and dessert, Amina leaned forward and said gently, “How do you even think about this past year?”

I set down my fork. Just days after my birthday last year, my husband was diagnosed with leukemia, and everything since then has felt slightly off-axis, as if life tilted and never quite returned to level ground. There was no neat answer to her question, no summary that could do justice to the fear, the strange stretches of calm, the way time seemed to stretch and then snap back.

“I don’t know,” I said. “It’s hard to put into words.”

“What about him?” someone else asked, not unkindly. “How has this changed him? How has it changed your family?”

I found myself talking about things I hadn’t planned to say. Not the big moments, but the quiet revisions to everyday life.

For most of our marriage, we barely marked time. Birthdays passed with a mumbled acknowledgment, maybe a card left on the counter. Anniversaries slipped by unobserved. The children’s birthdays I managed and insisted on. Those we celebrated, because childhood deserves its ceremonies. But for us, days bled into one another, undifferentiated and unremarkable.

A few years ago, I put my foot down. Maybe it was a meltdown. Maybe it was clarity breaking through like light through a crack.

“We have to start commemorating the special moments,” I told him one evening after another forgotten anniversary had come and gone. “Otherwise, what is life about if we let each day dissolve into the next without marking where we’ve been?”

He looked up from his laptop, not quite understanding why it mattered so much to me, why we needed to celebrate at all.

The change came slowly, grudgingly at first, like turning a rusty wheel. Birthdays began to involve cards, small gestures, attention paid. Anniversaries became occasions rather than dates we’d already flipped past. It felt forced for a while, performative in a way that made me wonder if I’d asked for something artificial, something that couldn’t take root in soil that had gone hard from neglect.

But this year, something shifted.

This year, my birthday arrived with flowers he’d chosen himself, a dinner he’d arranged with kanafe and ice cream for dessert, a favorite. He has realized now that even this is a space for creative investment, that the choosing matters as much as the gesture itself. Our daughter Zaynab presented me with a two-tier Jellycat cake she’d made, a little smiling face on top with tiny feet sticking out the bottom, as if the cake were sitting there pleased with itself. Mikael gave me a small standing crocheted ice cream cone that reads, life is better with a sprinkle of you in it. Coming from Mikael, I knew each word was laden with intent and emotion. They sang to me, badly and joyfully, and when I looked at their faces, I saw recognition there. Perhaps even an admission that I had been right all along. That it was worth it. That marking time is not vanity, but survival.

“You see?” I wanted to say, but didn’t need to.

At the dinner table with friends, I tried to explain this.

“Before all of this, there were other patterns that felt just as fixed,” I said, reaching for my water glass. “Eesa would ask his dad to throw a football around or do something physical together. Not a big commitment. Just time.”

“And?” Amina prompted.

“More often than not, the answer was no,” I said. “Too tired. Too much going on. Another task still unfinished in his head.”

I remembered watching Eesa’s face close over when his father said, “Maybe later, buddy,” without looking up from his phone. I remembered how affection, too, had its limits. How my husband would joke that I held his hand too tightly in public, as if handholding felt conspicuous, unnecessary. We loved each other, of course, but love lived efficiently then, tucked between obligations like receipts filed in a drawer. I didn’t expect interruptions. I didn’t expect him to wander into my office and lean down to kiss the top of my head while I was absorbed in my work, because that kind of softness wasn’t part of the rhythm we had established over years of practical coexistence.

This is not a story about what he failed to do. I cannot fully know what he was carrying then. His workload was immense, the stress constant and compounding. When you are under that kind of pressure, the world narrows to a pinpoint of necessity. You move forward with blinders on, focused on holding everything together. Stress doesn’t just exhaust you. It quietly teaches you what to overlook, and sometimes who.

What illness did was interrupt those grooves with the force of a record scratch.

“Now, instead of tossing a football for ten distracted minutes, he goes to the gym with Eesa almost every day,” I said. I see them leave together in the morning, my husband’s hand resting on our son’s shoulder as they head out the door. It’s not performative or forced. It’s become theirs, a space they’ve built together out of repetition and shared effort and presence. They lift weights. They talk, or sometimes they don’t. They just exist side by side in a way that feels deeper than anything I’d seen before, maybe deeper than what was possible before their bond was tested by the possibility of its ending.

And the affection I didn’t expect has arrived anyway, unannounced, naturalizing itself into our days. A hand reaching for mine without calculation. A casual touch as he passes by my desk. Last week, he came into my office while I was on a deadline, said nothing, kissed the top of my head, and left. As if to say that he sees me in this moment too. As if to say that I am not background.

The birthdays now feel natural, woven into the fabric of who we are rather than stitched on awkwardly. The anniversaries land with weight because we understand, finally, that time is not infinite, that we cannot assume there will always be another year to get it right.

Around the table, people nodded. I could see it in their faces, a kind of wonderment mixed with understanding, as if they were witnessing something they recognized but hadn’t quite known how to name.

“There was no grand reckoning,” I continued. “No speech about priorities.” Just a gradual shift in where his attention rests, a slow learning that celebration is not frivolity but witness. A way of saying that this day will not pass unmarked, that this person will not go unseen, that this moment, right here, matters.

What it feels like, from inside the family, is a change in casting. We are no longer background figures orbiting a demanding professional life, no longer the supporting infrastructure that makes everything else possible. We are the main scene, the story he is choosing to live inside.

Someone refilled my water glass. Across the table, candles flickered in their holders, small fires marking this evening as different from all the others that came before.

Caregiving has taught me that this is how lives change. It teaches you that to mark time is to honor it, and to honor time is to say that we were alive here, together, and we saw it. We did not let it slip past unmarked. We did not take it for granted.

At that birthday table, surrounded by friends who have watched this year from a distance, I realized that illness has not only exposed fragility, but clarified center. It has redrawn the floor plan of our life, pulling certain rooms forward and closing off others we once mistook for essential.

Care does that. It rearranges the architecture. It reveals where life is really being lived.

Leave a comment

I keep telling myself to write a new piece. I’ve been telling myself that since August.

The idea sits open on my laptop like an unfinished room, sentences framed but never drywalled, waiting for a quiet that never comes. Each week I promise myself the next flight, the next stolen evening, the next pocket of calm, and each week something more urgent arrives. Care does not knock. It simply walks in and sits down.

I thought I was waiting to write about my life. I didn’t realize the waiting was my life.

This fall, everything turned over at once: a new school, a new state, a new city whose streets I navigate by instinct rather than map. A new classroom of students who read me before I speak, deciding what kind of authority I am, what kind of care I will offer, what kind I will withhold. Teaching constitutional law for the first time meant waking early to revise lectures, doctrine running alongside domestic life, hypotheticals replaying themselves while I brushed my teeth and packed lunches and searched for missing shoes. Even as I moved through ordinary rituals, the law followed me, faint but insistent, asking to be shaped, explained, made legible to others.

I learned the cadence quickly: Sunday afternoon flights, the practiced efficiency of Clear and TSA Pre, the short hop to Lansing that became oddly intimate, the ride share smelling faintly of someone else’s coffee. By Wednesday night I was home again, bags in the mudroom, already scanning for what needed doing first.

“You’re back,” one of the kids would say—confirmation, not greeting.

“Yes,” I’d answer, dropping my purse, shrugging off my coat. “I’m back.”

Being home meant immediate recalibration. Making up for three nights gone, sitting longer at dinner, lingering in doorways, listening for what hadn’t been said in my absence. I’d rinse the mugs accumulated in the sink, start the dishwasher someone had loaded, turn off lights left glowing down the hall. Care is not only presence; it is the deliberate mending of what frays when you leave.

I told myself I would write when things slowed down. When I had perspective, when I could see the shape of what I was living clearly enough to name it. But you cannot witness your own life from inside the current. You can only move through it, mistaking motion for control.

One evening, my youngest said he wanted to ring in the new year early.

“Why?” I asked, half-smiling, bracing for something theatrical.

“Because 2025 was terrible,” he said, plainly. “It was the year Daddy was sick. And you were always traveling. It was just … a lot.”

A beat.

“It was a year of sudden stuff,” he added, reaching for language. “Like everything changed at once.”

I didn’t correct him or soften it. I nodded, because he was right. Children arrive at truth while we’re still managing logistics, still persuading ourselves that we’re fine. He had been taking inventory while I was busy keeping things moving. He saw what I was too close to see: that the year had asked too much, that the pace had cost something, that someone needed to say it out loud.

He became the witness I couldn’t be.

Now it’s the last day of the year. I’m home from our first family vacation in over a year, but I’m feverish, time slipping sideways, my body insisting on rest while my calendar refuses. The vacation already feels like a rumor. I unzip my suitcase on the bed and stop. Fold a shirt. Move it. Fold it again. My phone lights up on the dresser with another alert, another departure with a name attached to it.

I lean my weight against the dresser and say, quietly, “I’m tired.”

In two days, I’ll leave again—this time for Hawaii, with a spiritual development grant meant to restore my soul so that I can continue the work I do on religious pluralism, on listening across difference, on holding space for faith in a fractured public life. Even restoration, I’m learning, has a schedule. Even renewal must be justified.

I open my laptop, then close it. The document waits exactly where I left it, the cursor blinking with the steady patience of something that expects nothing from me.

What I want is a pause. Not escape or retreat, but a moment wide enough to see what I’ve been living inside. To recognize that this delayed piece is not an accident but evidence. That the architecture I’ve been inhabiting is built on vigilance and responsiveness and the quiet assumption that someone else’s needs must always come first.

I had been thinking of writing as something separate from caregiving, a refuge from it, a way to process experience from a distance. But maybe that was wrong. Maybe writing isn’t escape at all. Maybe it’s a kind of witnessing that requires stillness before it offers meaning.

In the morning, I slide a notebook into the side pocket of the suitcase without deciding whether I’ll use it. It’s an old habit, this gesture—packing the possibility of thought alongside the certainty of obligation. The notebook has followed me to dozens of places, its pages mostly blank, a quiet promise I keep making to myself even when I know I won’t have time to keep it.

Care, I’m learning, is not only what we give. It is the structure that determines what we’re allowed to postpone. Writing fell to the bottom not because it mattered least, but because everything else declared itself essential first. The piece I couldn’t write became the piece I was living.

This piece has been waiting because I have been holding everything else up.

And maybe that, too, is what needed to be said. That the cost of care is not only exhaustion, but the loss of the distance required to see yourself clearly. That sometimes your child has to tell you what you’ve been living through because you’ve been too busy living it to notice.

The postponement was never a failure.

It was the evidence.

Subscribe now

Friday afternoon, 1:10 p.m. The oncology ward smells of disinfectant and flowers left too long in water. Shabbir’s hand curls around the brass bell and for a moment, neither of us moves. The metal is warm from the sun slanting through tall windows, warm from all the hope it has carried.

For months, Shabbir sat in his small infusion room, tethered to IV lines, listening as the bell rang out in the hallway. Through the thin walls, he could hear the cheers of families, the muffled sobs that always accompanied release. He imagined their faces, studied their voices the way an anthropologist studies artifacts, searching for clues to what finishing might feel like.

Now it is our turn, and the moment feels both enormous and anticlimactic, like reaching a summit only to find the view hidden in clouds.

He pulls the rope. The sound cuts through the ward, and the nurses—so often focused on vitals glowing on iPads and computers—pause to clap and cheer. Their applause rises above the steady hum of machines keeping others alive. Sharp and final, the bell declares what we can hardly believe: we are no longer patients.

“That’s it,” the nurse says, her smile genuine but practiced. “You’re done.”

Done. The word rattles in my head like a marble in an empty jar. After months of living appointment to appointment, pill to pill, number to number, the absence of “next time” feels disorienting. Like finishing a book you never wanted to read but couldn’t put down, only to discover you’ve forgotten how to live without its gravity.

We gather the detritus of survival: color-coded pill organizers, the thermometer that became an extension of my hand. The car fills with leftover supplies and discharge papers, the archaeology of crisis. We point toward New Jersey, toward Shabbir’s sister’s house, toward normal people doing normal things.

An hour into the drive, drizzle swells into downpour, the kind that turns windshields into waterfalls. But we keep going, because we are done waiting. Then the sun breaks through. A rainbow stretches across the entire sky, vivid as if painted with liquid light. It arcs from the industrial landscape behind us to the New Jersey suburbs ahead, toward graduation parties and family chaos. We drive straight into it, as if we might pass through and emerge transformed.

“Well,” Shabbir says. That’s all, but I hear everything in it—relief, recognition, gratitude. The universe has offered a metaphor too precise to ignore. Sometimes the ordinary physics of water and light conspire to create a bridge just when you need one.

What Nobody Tells You About Finishing

The glossy survivor pamphlets don’t say this: the end doesn’t feel like an end. It feels like a waiting room between who you were and who you are becoming. Not sick anymore, but not quite well either. No ritual exists for the transition back from patient to person. You leave with discharge papers thick as a novella and a pharmacy’s worth of rattling bottles. You’re told to “take it easy,” as if easy were a place you could simply decide to visit.

A few days ago, they removed Shabbir’s central line. For months, it was his lifeline, the portal through which medicine kept him alive. Now it’s gone, replaced by a small scar. He takes multiple showers a day, reveling in the freedom of water without plastic wrap. But the instructions are clear: recovery takes a year. His new immune system—Zaynab’s generous gift, a biological love letter—must learn to recognize self from other, to settle in and defend.

Before is gone. The man who once planned summers around conferences now knows the taste of neutropenia, the meaning of engraftment. He has watched his daughter save his life with casual heroism. Crisis forced clarity: survive today. Tomorrow could wait. But “done” is messier. It means rebuilding around fragility, managing a dozen medications with contradictory warnings, relearning the difference between recovery and remission.

And it means facing others’ expectations. Friends and relatives expect relief, gratitude, readiness to return to normal. Some days we do feel those things. But we have been speaking another language for too long; ordinary conversation now feels foreign.

“How was your summer?” The question hovers, impossible to answer without either lying or saying too much.

The Arithmetic of Ordinary Days

Last weekend, I escaped—for the first time all summer. In Las Vegas, improbable city of light, the Backstreet Boys sang inside the Sphere. Stars exploded across its curved ceiling in impossible constellations, and for ninety minutes I was transported, vibrating with joy in a crowd of fifteen thousand. A version of myself I thought I’d lost resurfaced, singing along, untouched by medical vocabulary.

In Vegas, wonder felt like something borrowed, brief and personal. A week later, it arrived again, this time stretched across the sky, large enough to hold all of us. The rainbow lasted three minutes before dissolving back into gray. But in those minutes, it felt like a handoff, from the family who survived crisis to the family who must now learn to navigate its absence.

Zaynab, two months past her stem cell donation, is packing for college, arguing about dorm room décor and orientation events. Her story carries on. Eesa surprised us with quiet competence, emptying trash, tidying apartments, knowing when to vanish and when to be present. Now he returns to video games and sleepovers, though with a protective awareness in his gaze. Our children are experts now in the fragility of parents. And Mikael, the youngest, keeps asking when Daddy will be “all the way better.” It is a fair question without a simple answer.

The Strange Physics of Moving Forward

The drive to New Jersey should have felt like triumph, but instead it felt like the ache after holding your breath too long. For months, time was measured in precise medical units—fractions of blood counts, hours between pills, survival percentages. Now time has to be relearned in civilian form: vacations, bedtime, silence without vigilance. It is like learning to walk in a world where gravity has shifted.

The rainbow reminded us: bridges don’t carry you; you must walk them, step-by-step, trusting the unseen foundations.

After the Threshold

Saturday morning, Shabbir’s sister’s house buzzes with celebration. One nephew graduating high school, another heading to med school. Beginnings everywhere: graduation caps and discharge papers, congratulations cards and new plans. Relatives who asked, “How is he?” now ask, “What’s next?” The question feels lighter, carrying possibility instead of dread.

Children race through the yard, oblivious to yesterday’s milestone. The world spun on while we survived. Now we rejoin it, not as spectators but as participants. Rejoining isn’t the same as returning, because something has shifted, some recalibration of what matters.

Tonight, we drive home. The house will smell familiar but feel altered, because we are altered. We survived something we thought might break us.

Now what?

“Anything you say or do can be used in my Substack.”

It started as a joke, something to deflate the tension of my phone appearing mid-conversation, of me scanning the room for sentences before anyone else had finished theirs. My kids said it to tease me. They still do. It has become our shorthand for what they already know: I am always half somewhere else, half inside the sentence I’m writing about them.

At first, I believed I was writing about my life. Now I’m not so sure. Now it feels like I am living my life in order to write about it.

Everything becomes potential material. Your daughter donates bone marrow, and you write an essay about divine order and cellular transformation. Your teenager screams in all caps over text, and you frame it as “The Wild Currents We Navigate.” Your husband’s illness becomes a newsletter called The Architecture of Care. Crisis as content, grief as genre.

I thought I was chronicling life. Maybe I was composing a version of it instead.

When I wrote about Zaynab’s graduation and bone marrow donation, eight days apart, I shaped it as a meditation on time, on what it means to come of age while simultaneously stepping into the hardest kind of adulthood. What I didn’t say—what I couldn’t say—was that it felt mostly like logistics. Phone calls and forms and everyone else waiting for me to coordinate schedules while they focused on meaning.

The meaning, I discovered, was mine to manufacture.

Some things don’t translate. Some truths resist curation. Family moments have jagged edges that tear through any container you try to build for them. Yet the digital attention economy whispers otherwise: nothing has value unless it can be shared, liked, commented upon. So, you learn to sand down the edges, to transform chaos into growth, to sculpt even private breakdowns into the kind of vulnerability that performs well online.

And readers respond. They praise “authenticity.” They say they feel seen. They tell you the story mattered. It does. But you know what they’re seeing is already shaped: the real argument, the real tears, cut in the edit room. The rawness exchanged for coherence.

I catch myself now in the act: watching my daughter’s face crumple in disappointment while already composing the metaphor for teenage heartbreak. Feeling my husband’s hand, heavy in mine during a doctor’s visit, while cataloging its literary possibilities. I don’t know when I became this person, the one who experiences moments as quotable quotes.

Didion once wrote about keeping notebooks to remember “what it was to be me.” I wonder if I am writing to remember what it was to be us. Or if I am writing instead to create an “us” for public consumption.

I tell myself most of life still escapes the lens: the silent mornings, the jokes we never explain, the fights that reveal nothing profound. But I know the truth: the writer’s eye never fully closes. Some part of me is always standing slightly outside our life, taking notes.

And yet I can’t dismiss what this work does. The essay I wrote about caregiving—how invisible labor gnaws at your sense of self—drew dozens of messages from women who said they felt less alone. I gave language to what they had been carrying silently. That felt like purpose.

But I also made our suffering beautiful. I turned our chaos into art: water becoming steam, the weight of caregiving evaporating into something you could hold and admire. That is the trick, isn’t it? To make life feel meaningful rather than simply, relentlessly hard.

Maybe acknowledging this curation is itself a form of honesty. Maybe it’s the only kind available to those of us who turn private life into narrative. But even this confession becomes content, this critique becomes brand. The attempt to step outside the system becomes part of the system.

Perhaps the work is not to escape the contradiction, but to name it clearly. To honor both the service and the cost of making private life public.

After all, anything you say or do can be used in my Substack—including this confession about using everything in my Substack.

Some days I miss her, and she’s still in the room—a phantom ache that settles in my chest like grief for someone who hasn’t left yet, who may never leave, but who feels impossibly distant even as she breathes the same recycled apartment air.

Zaynab, my eighteen-year-old daughter, carries contradictions in her newly adult body the way I carry mine in my forty-something one. She’s the girl who offered her bone marrow to save her father’s life without hesitation, who can make our temporary Baltimore apartment feel briefly like home with her easy laughter echoing off unfamiliar walls. She’s also the one who can trigger in me a rage so immediate and molten it surprises us both—a fury that rises from some primal place where love and frustration tangle until I can’t tell where protection ends and exasperation begins.

The contradiction lives in my body now, a constant tension between the mother who wants to hold her close and the one who sometimes wants to shake her until she understands that while this isn’t forever, right now we need all hands on deck.

We’ve spent these months in Baltimore for Shabbir’s cancer treatment—a finite sentence with a good prognosis, treatment that will wrap up by the end of summer and return us to our real lives. But temporary doesn’t mean easy. Our lives are compressed into a two-bedroom apartment that smells faintly of disinfectant and someone else’s cooking, where my eight-year-old heads to camp each morning with the resilience that only small children possess, where my thirteen-year-old has become my unexpected ally—throwing out vomit bags without flinching, keeping the apartment tidy, offering his broadening shoulders as support when his dad walks from car to door, joking easily in a way that makes Shabbir’s eyes crinkle with something that isn’t pain.

But Zaynab exists in her own orbit, helping here and there when asked but mostly floating through our crisis like a visitor passing through someone else’s emergency. Most weekends, she escapes back to Potomac where her real life waits—graduation parties where she can be eighteen and unencumbered, sleepovers where she can forget the sound of retching through thin walls, concerts where the music drowns out the medical terminology that has become our temporary vocabulary. This week she’s asking for even more days away, and I can feel her need like a physical pull, the way a plant turns toward light.

We’ve said yes again and again, not because we aren’t stretched thin as wire, but because we want her to live—to be eighteen and free and focused on herself in the way eighteen-year-olds are supposed to be, to not have to carry the weight of our temporary upheaval on shoulders that should only know the burden of college applications and summer plans.

And yet. Yesterday, she asked for more.

The ask came while I was juggling the complex mathematics of short-term crisis: blending soft foods Shabbir could stomach in his treatment-ravaged state, coordinating my thirteen-year-old’s helpful energy with my eight-year-old’s camp schedule, managing the logistics of a life temporarily displaced while scrambling to meet a deadline because bills don’t pause for chemotherapy. The words tumbled out before I could catch them, sharp-edged and unforgiving.

“Now is not the time to be self-centered,” I said, and watched that word—self-centered—hit her like a physical blow.

She spun from the kitchen, sneakers squeaking against vinyl in a sound that will haunt me, voice cracking with a fury that seemed to come from her toes. The apartment felt too small to contain us both, the air too thick to breathe. We both cried—loud, messy tears that bounced off unfamiliar walls and settled into the cracks between us like salt in a wound. Then we retreated to opposite ends of the space, trying to breathe through what felt like drowning on dry land, each of us gasping for something the other couldn’t give.

She’s trying to make sense of a disruption that feels enormous even though we all know it’s temporary, where every choice ripples outward to touch her father’s treatments, my sanity, her siblings’ carefully maintained normalcy. I’m holding our family together through this finite but intense period with caffeine and the kind of desperate love that sometimes looks like anger because it has nowhere else to go.

When illness temporarily enters a household, everything sharpens to a point that cuts. Eighteen-year-olds who should be thinking about college and independence are instead confronted with their parents’ mortality, their family’s fragility. They swing between wanting to help and needing to escape, between guilt over their normalcy and resentment at being needed, between the child who still wants to be taken care of and the adult who sees too clearly what’s being asked of them.

This morning, the switch flipped again. After a day of slammed doors and silence thick enough to choke on, she called out to me as “Mommy” and asked for Nutella on croissant bread, her voice soft and small like it used to be when she was six and the world’s biggest problem was whether her sandwich was cut into triangles or squares.

No apologies. Just a return, tentative and hopeful as dawn.

That night, once the apartment had settled into uneasy quiet punctuated only by Shabbir’s treatment-disrupted sleep, I scrolled the news with the desperate hunger of someone looking for distraction from their own temporarily upended life. That’s when I saw the story that wouldn’t let me go: the Camp Mystic flood in Texas.

Eighteen-year-old girls, trapped by rising waters, screaming as they clung to trees while rescue swimmers pulled 165 people to safety. But what pierced me wasn’t the water—it was imagining the parents getting that call. Your daughter is at camp, that sacred space of sunscreen and friendship bracelets, and suddenly you’re hearing words like “flash flood” and “helicopter rescue” and “we’re doing everything we can.”

One minute, you’re worried about sunscreen. The next, you’re praying she remembers how to swim.

The metaphor crystallized with brutal clarity: this is what we’re doing, too. Every day during this temporary crisis. Rescuing. Reaching. Holding on through rising waters that threaten to sweep us all away, even though we know the flood will recede.

In crisis, even temporary ones, we form human chains, holding each other even when we’re angry, refusing to let go even when holding on hurts. And sometimes, the ones we’re trying to save are the ones thrashing against our grip—not because they don’t love us, but because even short-term drowning makes you desperate, makes you fight the very hands trying to pull you to shore.

Some days, the rage sits just beneath my surface like a living thing, sharp and metallic, when she floats through our temporary chaos seemingly untouched while her younger brother empties vomit bags without complaint. The fury of loving someone so much while feeling invisible to them, the exhaustion of being both lifeline and ignored, the impossible weight of being needed by everyone except the one who should care most.

But then she says “Mommy” and asks for Nutella, and I remember: this is the return. Not the calm after the storm, but the tether—the love that keeps pulling us back to shore, even while we’re both still gasping for air, even while the temporary flood keeps rising around us.

Subscribe now